<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Style Poll Results and a New Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tutwow.com/news/design-style-poll-results-and-a-new-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tutwow.com/news/design-style-poll-results-and-a-new-poll/</link>
	<description>Playing Creativity Tag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://www.tutwow.com/news/design-style-poll-results-and-a-new-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-6259</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tutwow.com/?p=1104#comment-6259</guid>
		<description>Not really - the whole point of web 2.0 is to display dynamic data as cleanly as possible which pretty much fits in with minimalistic (for example, facebook&#039;s design is ultra minimalistic, it&#039;s all about what&#039;s IN the page)

Though I agree when the &quot;web 2.0 feel&quot; first started trending, people went overkill with their gradients and drop shadows, but now pretty much everyone gets that it&#039;s all about subtlety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really &#8211; the whole point of web 2.0 is to display dynamic data as cleanly as possible which pretty much fits in with minimalistic (for example, facebook&#8217;s design is ultra minimalistic, it&#8217;s all about what&#8217;s IN the page)</p>
<p>Though I agree when the &#8220;web 2.0 feel&#8221; first started trending, people went overkill with their gradients and drop shadows, but now pretty much everyone gets that it&#8217;s all about subtlety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Lind</title>
		<link>http://www.tutwow.com/news/design-style-poll-results-and-a-new-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Lind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 02:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tutwow.com/?p=1104#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>True, that&#039;s what it was meant for originally, but I have found in my personal experience that when people try to get a &quot;web 2.0 feel&quot; (at least when the style was first trending), it ends up being cluttered and a bit distracting. Would you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, that&#8217;s what it was meant for originally, but I have found in my personal experience that when people try to get a &#8220;web 2.0 feel&#8221; (at least when the style was first trending), it ends up being cluttered and a bit distracting. Would you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.tutwow.com/news/design-style-poll-results-and-a-new-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 02:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tutwow.com/?p=1104#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>I would like to point out that web 2.0 is very similar to minimalistic. The idea behind 2.0 was to make the web more accessible and dynamic. This meant removing clutter that hindered the user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to point out that web 2.0 is very similar to minimalistic. The idea behind 2.0 was to make the web more accessible and dynamic. This meant removing clutter that hindered the user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

